Difference between revisions of "Talk:Primus Database Guidelines"

From PRIMUS Database
Jump to: navigation, search
(Re:Lore-related Articles)
(Re:Lore-related Articles)
Line 1: Line 1:
 
==Re:Lore-related Articles==
 
==Re:Lore-related Articles==
 
Attn: mods. In [http://championsonlineroleplayers.shivtr.com/forum_threads/1503662 this CORP thread on including lore-related content], it was polled that users of the PDb found it helpful if such pages were included (depending on how it was done). With that said, are we officially nixing the restriction against canon content from the guidelines? --'''Δ [[User:Epelesker|Epelesker]]''' ([[User talk:Epelesker|talk]]) 02:50, 15 September 2013 (MST)
 
Attn: mods. In [http://championsonlineroleplayers.shivtr.com/forum_threads/1503662 this CORP thread on including lore-related content], it was polled that users of the PDb found it helpful if such pages were included (depending on how it was done). With that said, are we officially nixing the restriction against canon content from the guidelines? --'''Δ [[User:Epelesker|Epelesker]]''' ([[User talk:Epelesker|talk]]) 02:50, 15 September 2013 (MST)
 
+
:I'd say yes. Some of it was appearing as it was when the site came down. And FV (and others) have been keeping busy putting some of it back in again. Note how this link has some of its bits filled in by canon links: [[Millennium_City]] - [[User:Destructor|Destructor]] ([[User talk:Destructor|talk]]) 19:44, 15 September 2013 (MST)
I'd say yes. Some of it was appearing as it was when the site came down. And FV (and others) have been keeping busy putting some of it back in again. Note how this link has some of its bits filled in by canon links: [[Millennium_City]] - [[User:Destructor|Destructor]] ([[User talk:Destructor|talk]]) 19:44, 15 September 2013 (MST)
+
::Right-o. I think, then, that we should probably try to gather up as many  of these canon content pages under a category and/or use a header template to let people know it's not user created stuff. --'''Δ [[User:Epelesker|Epelesker]]''' ([[User talk:Epelesker|talk]]) 20:16, 15 September 2013 (MST)

Revision as of 03:16, 16 September 2013

Re:Lore-related Articles

Attn: mods. In this CORP thread on including lore-related content, it was polled that users of the PDb found it helpful if such pages were included (depending on how it was done). With that said, are we officially nixing the restriction against canon content from the guidelines? --Δ Epelesker (talk) 02:50, 15 September 2013 (MST)

I'd say yes. Some of it was appearing as it was when the site came down. And FV (and others) have been keeping busy putting some of it back in again. Note how this link has some of its bits filled in by canon links: Millennium_City - Destructor (talk) 19:44, 15 September 2013 (MST)
Right-o. I think, then, that we should probably try to gather up as many of these canon content pages under a category and/or use a header template to let people know it's not user created stuff. --Δ Epelesker (talk) 20:16, 15 September 2013 (MST)