Difference between revisions of "Talk:Primus Database Guidelines"
From PRIMUS Database
(→Next up!: new section) |
Destructor (Talk | contribs) |
||
| Line 7: | Line 7: | ||
Alright, I'm making this page my next project. Any pre-emptive feedback from my fellow mods before I get started? --'''Δ [[User:Epelesker|Epelesker]]''' ([[User talk:Epelesker|talk]]) 18:57, 22 September 2013 (MST) | Alright, I'm making this page my next project. Any pre-emptive feedback from my fellow mods before I get started? --'''Δ [[User:Epelesker|Epelesker]]''' ([[User talk:Epelesker|talk]]) 18:57, 22 September 2013 (MST) | ||
| + | :Well, giving it a quick look over, it does seem to cover the general guidelines that I can think of. Although no doubt you have a few things in mind if I had to make a guess. [[User:Destructor|Destructor]] ([[User talk:Destructor|talk]]) 00:08, 23 September 2013 (MST) | ||
Revision as of 07:08, 23 September 2013
Attn: mods. In this CORP thread on including lore-related content, it was polled that users of the PDb found it helpful if such pages were included (depending on how it was done). With that said, are we officially nixing the restriction against canon content from the guidelines? --Δ Epelesker (talk) 02:50, 15 September 2013 (MST)
- I'd say yes. Some of it was appearing as it was when the site came down. And FV (and others) have been keeping busy putting some of it back in again. Note how this link has some of its bits filled in by canon links: Millennium_City - Destructor (talk) 19:44, 15 September 2013 (MST)
Next up!
Alright, I'm making this page my next project. Any pre-emptive feedback from my fellow mods before I get started? --Δ Epelesker (talk) 18:57, 22 September 2013 (MST)
- Well, giving it a quick look over, it does seem to cover the general guidelines that I can think of. Although no doubt you have a few things in mind if I had to make a guess. Destructor (talk) 00:08, 23 September 2013 (MST)
